Who has it
Single and multi-project developers, civil, MEP and EPC contractors, and infrastructure firms all carry the project and multi-site cost-to-complete view, and it is the promoter's biggest missing piece across all three. The contractor's job-economics view, with margin per project, retention held and certification status, is a distinct build from the developer's unit economics; infrastructure firms add multi-site consolidation. For property-sales and brokerage operations the funnel-economics dashboard is the core build, distinct again from project and job economics.
What we build
One project P&L and cost-to-complete view over the connected layer: budgeted vs committed vs actual cost, percent complete, cash position, projected surplus and ageing receivables, per project and consolidated across sites, plus a plain-English question box on top of the vetted numbers ("how much is overdue on Tower B?", "what is my cost-to-complete on the Wakad project?", "which contractor bills are pending approval?"). The view can be designed for in-country or on-prem deployment where required, subject to written scope and counsel review. For contractors there is a job-wise P&L and cost-to-complete dashboard: contract value, cost incurred vs budget, work done vs work certified vs work billed vs work collected, retention held, and the gap between value earned and cash received, consolidated across sites for infrastructure firms. For a brokerage operation there is a live conversion dashboard over the lead desk: leads, site visits, bookings and brokerage by source, by executive and by project, with cost-per-lead and cost-per-booking, so the owner runs the desk off numbers.